Thread:Support/Structured glossary/reply (6)

Basically it would be lot of effort for very little gain:
 * 1) OmegaWiki doesn't currently contain nearly any of the DefinedMeanings we need
 * 2) Even when it does, they have definitions in less than ten languages by average, usually including those languages which need it least.
 * 3) OmegaWiki lacks pretty much all high level term management functions (splitting, merging, changing terms)
 * 4) Proper integration would be a lot of work. Message annotation is slow and difficult and OmegaWiki is not helping us in this process.
 * 5) If we basically need to build our own terminology from scratch, why make it complicated and use OmegaWiki, which is not integrated in twn in any way