Thread:Support/Gothic Wikipedia/reply (6)

Would it take any ressources that would belong to vivant languages when I care about ancient languages? I don't think so. And I also work a lot on Low German, which is a living language, still. We have Wikipedias in Latin or Anglo Saxon. They are ancient, too. Wikipedia is a perfect way to document old languages and their wisdom and might help for a possible revitalisation, which is not that ridiculous, even hebrew was distinct and revitalised and now totally vital. If there are people who want to work on a Gothic wikipedia, there should be nothing against it, and I might tend to say it would be against the maxim of wikipedia. @Michawiki: You are right, I totally forgot, that I asked for the rights. ;) So, is Gothic supported just by the fact it is an official wikipedia? Or can I add translations but they don't get displayed because it is not supported? What does supported actually really mean? Just that translations are possible? And in the list you posted, there is Gothic as a supported language. So, it actually must be translated, right? I cannot remember what I translated, but I were sure that I translated something which wasn't displayed even weeks after that at wikipedia. If translations really work it could still be that I translated things I thought of to be other ones. I now asked again for translation rights.