Thread history

From Support
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
22:24, 6 June 2010 Hamilton Abreu (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
22:22, 6 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
22:15, 6 June 2010 Hamilton Abreu (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
15:10, 29 May 2010 He7d3r (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
21:49, 16 May 2010 Hamilton Abreu (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
20:37, 16 May 2010 He7d3r (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to PLURAL for pt-br)
08:52, 18 November 2009 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created  
08:44, 18 November 2009 Nike (talk | contribs) New reply created  
20:03, 17 November 2009 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created  
15:27, 17 November 2009 He7d3r (talk | contribs) New reply created  
19:20, 16 November 2009 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created  
19:01, 16 November 2009 He7d3r (talk | contribs) New thread created  

PLURAL for pt-br

Hello!

I would like to request that we have for pt-br the same that was done in mwr:58790, because we also use the plural form when a parameter is equals to zero: "You has 0 messages" instead of "You has 0 message".

By the way, is it possible to have 3 possible texts as in {{PLURAL:text if 0|text if 1|text if >1}}?

Helder19:01, 16 November 2009

More than two numeric forms are possible. CLDR says that the current config is correct. Please explain what and why precisely.

Siebrand19:20, 16 November 2009

I think that CLDR is not correct, because in pt-br it is used:

  • Você tem 0 mensagens (actually, we would prefer to say "Você não tem mensagens")
  • Você tem 1 mensagem
  • Você tem 2 mensagens (the same for N > 2)
Helder15:27, 17 November 2009

CLDR is a reviewed resource with a formal process. Linux distributions use it as a reliable source. For now, I am not inclined to want to change it in MediaWiki and deviate from CLDR. Please appeal with CLDR. If you *are* correct, that should be clear soon.

Siebrand20:03, 17 November 2009

It doesn't actually say anything about pt-br, just for pt, whatever it means.

Nike08:44, 18 November 2009

Then you please process this request. I said what I thought about it. It's easy enough, and I indicated that I will not take responsibility for doing what was asked.

Siebrand08:52, 18 November 2009