Thread history

Fragment of a discussion from Support
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
No results
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 11:50, 4 September 2011

I do not think that presence in CLDR is currently a good criterion for supporting a language here. It may take many months or more than a year to have a language added to CLDR. :-( Then you can start to get its basic data right, which again may take months, since CLDR most of the time does not accept new or corrected data :-(

Purodha Blissenbach00:02, 19 November 2009

The CLDR is like the ISO-639-3 a fine standard that is essential for the language policy. The CLDR would fit in perfectly because it provides a service that would benefit From my perspective it would suffice for the information to be supplied to the CLDR as it does provide the information and as it signals the relevance and importance of providing this infrormation. Accepting corrected data should take more time, correcting in standards is highly disruptive. Thanks,

GerardM07:41, 19 November 2009