Thread history

From Translating talk:Shapado
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
23:16, 19 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
23:02, 19 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
19:50, 16 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
19:02, 16 June 2010 Kghbln (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (add)
19:01, 16 June 2010 Kghbln (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (chg)
19:00, 16 June 2010 Kghbln (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
18:36, 16 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
12:57, 16 June 2010 Siebrand (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en)
11:38, 16 June 2010 Kghbln (talk | contribs) New thread created  

Shapado:Manage-admin.manage.properties.constrains.reputation constrains description/en

This formular allows you to configure how much reputation points users to be able to do a given action → This formular allows you to configure how much reputation points users need to be able to do a given action

I know I should not report things like this at the moment. However, if I do not do it now, I will most probably forget it.

kgh11:38, 16 June 2010

That's fine to report. Reporting PLURAL issues is not something that we can do something with.

Siebrand12:57, 16 June 2010
 

Updated to "This form allows you to configure how many reputation points users gain or lose for a given action". Will be updated within a few days.

Siebrand18:36, 16 June 2010

Hi Siebrand, thanks for your help. Are you sure the new message text is ok? It has a totally different meaning now and it does not fit to the message description. Cheers

kgh19:00, 16 June 2010

I'll double check. I interpreted the message as I paraphrased it; I see it can also be explained differently.

Siebrand19:50, 16 June 2010

I've asked Patcito to take a look at it.

Siebrand23:02, 19 June 2010

Fixed Fixed

Siebrand23:16, 19 June 2010