Please note actions by [[User:Liuxinyu970226]]
I'm not "don't care what zhwiki uses"-ing, the case you point looks like under User:Cwlin0416
Wondering if this user can also saying sorry to above? Also, is consensus really stabilizable (c.f. MassMessage translations)?
The terminology can be (mostly) stabilized, especially the "whom to take, tw or hk" split seen in zh-hant translations. (I am quite happy that no zh-SG speakers have argued with zh-CN speakers to date, by the way.)
As a side note, keeping translations from both sides in that fictional "whom to take from" table would be helpful for custom install-time language splitting by tools like OpenCC (it does hk-tw conversion too), thus providing a solution for current "merged hant" problem.
"The terminology can be (mostly) stabilized" haven't you seen the MassMessage example? Per history, the MassMessage was having these translations:
- 大量信息发送者/大量消息发送者 (mainly provided by me)
- 群发消息者/群發消息者 (provided by @飞舞回堂前:, a Wuu Chinese user)
- 大量訊息寄件者 (provided by @Cwlin0416:)
- 大量訊息發送者 (provided by @Bowleerin:)
Is this still stabilized? If still yes, then let you see the history of MediaWiki:Last/zh-hans where 11 diffs about "prev" happened.