Enable [[Project:Terminology gadget|Terminology gadget]] by default?

That's completely the opposite of what I perceive, and any translation would treat the former as a strong slang word, not the later one which is very weak, and frequently used by people for themselves. I've seen that term frequentl used by official supports and moderators in forums, and by developers that receive offensive comments, when these supprots are treated being "lazy", or not abeing able to support a request which is postponed or abandoned later when stalled without possible action for too long (but no one was initerest to provide a patch, maintenance or review, but users just complain and reject other proposed solutions/alternatives). Here he was propsoed an alternative that is well supported (he has the choice of supported browsers for his platform, we are not forcing them). I understand his deception. But how would you decribe the reaction he unexpectedly had above? See for example how Quora describes it (and what moderation action they may take if someone acts like this); there are similar rules in moderated and reviewed social networks (like 4chan, Reddit), or support forums (Microsoft, Oracle), but unfortunately not in most others (Twitter, Facebook, do nothing unless there's a violation of law, or violation of their censorship on some topics, even if it's perfectly legal and respectable, including very wellknown artworks in museums)...