|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Summary||4||12:37, 13 November 2010|
I see no use for this kind of edit summaries, and that's why we have autosummaries disabled.
I hate when I need to open every message from RC to be able to review the translation.
You can see the translations from Atom feed. I'm working on getting the definitions too there.
This does not look very legible to me (in Opera, at least). (Not to mention those two additional clicks needed to get to it.) Now, the version I get when not logged in seems a bit better… Isn’t that a bug, RC feed should be ignorant of user options, shouldn’t it?
Is there any problem using edit summaries for… well… edit summaries? It is fine to improve feeds, but I am not really interested in feeds, I use the RC page and I can’t see a reason to have that page unusable.
I don't know what you are seeing in the feed.
Summary should be the reason why you did a particular change, which for new messages is always the same and should be left out. Like I said in the previous message, I and other people are trying to make proper tools for doing review. Until they are ready feel free to do what you think is best.