How can we improve the documentation of the language by Portaldiq?

The usual ways are:

  • add in the first line/incipit which language "diq" is about, with all the possible specifications to be less ambiguous;
  • add a section with language resources (e.g. reference grammars, dictionaries, authorities, literature);
  • add a section or subpage with a glossary for established terminology.
Nemo (talk)‎13:26, 12 January 2017

I did, I added sources about grammar, standard and dictionary. Should I expand or add more?

Gırd (talk)‎14:05, 12 January 2017

Thanks, that helps. Is there some term or grammatical issue that frequently appears in the debates and edit wars on diq messages? If so, it would be good to mention them and maybe link or quote some examples of good and bad translations.

Nemo (talk)‎15:16, 12 January 2017

I mentioned bad and good translations. I can expand them and write more if needs be.

Gırd (talk)‎16:40, 12 January 2017
 
 
 
Retrieved from "https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Nemo_bis/How_can_we_improve_the_documentation_of_the_language_by_Portaldiq%3F/reply#How_can_we_improve_the_documentation_of_the_language_by_Portaldiq?_52709"