About [[MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-force-header/ksh]], [[MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-header/ksh]], [[MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-content/kMediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-force-content/ksh]]sh]]
Appearance
About MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-force-header/ksh, MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-header/ksh, MediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-content/kMediaWiki:Tpt-discouraged-language-force-content/kshsh]]
Thread summary:[Link to]
[Edit]
OPEN This issue is open, waiting for action
Please file a GRAMMAR patch for ksh including the required case for ten or so languages to kick off the discussion with a concrete basis.
This messages require grammatical modifications on the language, $1, which we currently do not have. That has been mentioned elsewhere on Support already with some details.
General question: What to do? Shall we merge these cases into GRAMMAR although it is a complete different use case in the languages that I am aware of, or should we rather target to have an own construct (e.g. LANGRAMMAR) for it, or shall we wait and try to have these solved via CLDR?
While I certainly prefer the latter, it is likely going to take years, and does imho not spare us a (generic) LANGRAMMAR.
See also T50635.