Please support "Traditional Mongolian Script"

I would exclusively oppose mn-Mong, as currently the Traditional Mongolian language is having a test-Wikipedia against at incubator:Wp/mvf.

Liuxinyu970226 (talk)13:15, 27 May 2017
  • One of the reason why the wiki is at mvf because creation of test wiki with codes like mn-Mong are not allowed?
  • Code on TWN do not need to correspond to wiki site code. For example, we have lzh and yue in TWN, while their wikis are now using zh-classical and zh-yue code.
C933103 (talk)22:20, 12 November 2017

I would leave first question for @Nikerabbit:, as the code selection should be judged by him. For the second question, URLs of both wikis are to be renamed, but not soon, technical blocks are listed on phab:T172035.

Liuxinyu970226 (talk)03:50, 13 November 2017
 

@C933103: The another reason that I oppose mn-Mong is the touchability, as a matching example, the Azerbaijani can be written (commonly) in Latin and Persian (aka Perso-Arabic) scripts, however, due to the tonal incompatible, we enabled both ISO 639-1 az for Latin (the national official language of the Republic of Azerbaijan, which should points ISO 639-3 azj "Northern Azerbaijani") and ISO 639-3 azb for Persian (the regional official language of South Azerbaijan province (?) of Iran, called "Southern Azerbaijani" in SIL website).

Liuxinyu970226 (talk)12:51, 13 November 2017

I believe there are no "incompatibility" between khk Mongolian and mvf Mongolian when writing with the Mongolian script. (Although Russian-originated words and Chinese-originated words will be different).

C933103 (talk)21:46, 15 November 2017