About [[MediaWiki:Rollbacklinkcount/en]] and [[MediaWiki:Rollbacklinkcount-morethan/en]]

Thanks very much for your thoughtful and detailed reply.

I've always interpreted the "rollback" link (to which the quantity of edits was just added) as a noun, but I respect your interpretation and certainly don't wish to cause any confusion. I also appreciate your point regarding the benefit of using a verb for this purpose.

So as an alternative, I suggest "roll back $1 edits". That's the action to which the noun "rollback" conventionally refers. It retains the familiar terminology and eliminates the ambiguity.

Does that seem okay to you?

David Levy (talk)23:44, 23 August 2012

"Roll back $1 edits" sounds good to me.

Lloffiwr (talk)12:23, 24 August 2012

If the English source is to be amended, we should also amend MediaWiki:Rollbacklink/en which appears on the recent changes page and which also serves as a 'one-click' link/submit button.

How is the message MediaWiki:Rollback short/en used? There is no qqq for it.

Lloffiwr (talk)12:34, 24 August 2012