Report [[User:Cwlin0416]]'s vandalism

Zhxy 519 started this thread, and use an accusatory tone. I'm very sincerity want to know the problem. According to this topic thread, I can read about "Making a list of problematic terms" many times, ... but there is NO LIST about terminology that you think is problematic. so what should we discuss? No matter what you are, here is translatewiki, not wikipedia. MediaWiki is open source project, not ONLY FOR zh wikipedia. Why should i report my edition in advance to ask users opinions "AT ZH WIKIPEDIA?", this is your responsibility not mine.

Any translation result are based on i'm zh-hant native user, are you? what you want to translate in zh-cn, i don't care. You tired, i'm tired too, this is very ridiculous.

It is your responsibility. Your works here serve all wikiprojects, not works unrelated to anything else. Any software maker knows to ask for their customers opinions in advance, your work cannot be exception. Chinese Wikipedia was firstly managed by zh-hans users but many words are widely accepted by zh-hant users. Those words are now Chinese Wikipedia idioms. Open source project doesn't mean Eden for 1 Adam or 2 Eves.

WHAT WORDS? I still don't see any list at https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Portal:Zh All of you are just running in circles. This is the perfect way to make it impossible for any translator to follow and contribute, and I don't like it.

As you wish, Nemo, there is the vocabulary now.

Fantastic! Very well done Zhxy 519. Now, everyone who has something to say about the table please open a new thread in Chinese. :)

However Nemo, I insist all Cwlin0416's edits must be admitted by Chinese Wikiproject community, not by himself. Especially as his controversial edits focusing on already established Chinese Wikiproject idioms.

All Chinese ?? All Simplified Chinese community or Traditional Chinese community??? Who do you think you are? I insist if Zhxy 519 are not native Traditional Chinese user, all Zhxy 519's edits must be admitted by native Traditional Chinese translator.

By the way, Your contribution at translatewiki.net is zero, all your edits are only reverts. If you cannot prove you motivation is make translation better. You are not qualified translator. so stop your vandalism.

You are the one not a qualified translator. You are serving Wikiprojects contributors, otherwise what do you think you are coming here for? How can you be so selfish. You are the one making vandalism. Stop it and learn what are Wikiprojects.

You are using wikiproject's name to making vandalism. The translation you revert not only wikiprojects. No matter what you said, it cannot change what you do.

What else can you say? If you have time to abuse me, why never see you start a topic in Chinese wikiprojects to notice the other users? These word we have been used for more than 10 years, you must stop your selfish illegal possession of wikitranslate.

Pardon, Mr. Nemo, according to the recently histories of this page, there seems like a personal dispute between Cwlin0416 and Zhxy 519, so if this keeps simmering, I will move this list to a subpage to make this portal page more cleanly.

You are not authorized to make any arbitration. And plz stop speculating the issue without focusing the real vandalism.

• (cur | prev) 00:55, 4 July 2015‎ Cwlin0416 ‎ . . (2,542 bytes) (+9)‎ . . (你不代表維基社群，台灣用法也不需維基社群承認) (undo | thank)
• (cur | prev) 15:29, 3 July 2015‎ Zhxy 519 ‎ . . (2,533 bytes) (-9)‎ . . (Undo revision 6312420 by Cwlin0416 (talk) 維基社群沒有承認的用法，稱不得台灣用法。) (undo | thank)

How do I review these 2? If they are not personal dispute please tell me how do you define this phenomenon.

Somebody who think himself represents Wikimedia community, and want to change the terminology which traditional Chinese local people actually use.

I thought the purpose of translation is make local people to use MediaWiki more friendly. I never know translation need Wikimedia community to approve.

You believe yourself represent traditional Chinese local people? Wikimedia community has most people using MediaWiki most frequently. The best way to make it friendly is not to change user customs casually.

PS: His "You are not authorized to make any arbitration." gives me this "rule": If someone wants to resolve this issue, he at least must be an Arbitration Committee member, however, the Chinese Wikipedia has rejected the proposal to create ArbCom (see w:zh:Wikipedia_talk:仲裁委员会)