Translating:Lib.reviews/FAQ/ce

ХӀунда lib.reviews?

Тхо тешна ду, оха сацамаш тӀеоьцуш лелош йолу информаци — муьлха жайна деша деза, мичахь дахаран меттиг хила йеза, йа муьлха сурсат эца деза бохучух лаьцна — лакхара дикалла йолуш хир йу, нагахь санна вай иза йиллинчу йукъараллехула шера вовшахтоьхча. Оха лелайо цхьайолу принципаш, Википеди а, OpenStreetMap а санна йолчу проекташа кечйина: йиллина хьостан кодийн база, массо а чулацаман йиллина лицензи, пайда эцаран Ӏалашо йоцуш.

Иштта цо аьтто бо вайна оцу а, кхин йолчу а йолчу проекташца цхьаьнаболх бан, бизнесах, продукцех, и.дӀ.кх.а лаьцна маьрша а, схьайиллина а метахаамаш гулбан а, вовшахтоха а.

Рецензеш дика хилар муха лардо аша?

ХӀокху хенахь, оха доьху декъашхошка, тӀейазбалале хьалха, хӀозехула чекхбовлар, кхайкхаран хьажорг схьаэцархьама. ХӀара атта некъ бу кхиаран терго йан а, керла декъашхой сайте мила бохьу кхета а, цундела вай кхиарца дикалла тергалйан а, хьалхе спамах лардалла а йиш йу.

Хан йаларца, тхан цхьа-ши ойла йу дикалла латто/лакхадаккха:

• Командаш — иза цхьаьнаболхбан луучу декъашхошна некъ бу. Ахь бен ца къасто йиш йу йеллачу командан йухахьажам, цо шен «дикачу линза» ло, хӀунда аьлча хӀора командан йиш йу шен-шен дӀакъастаран бакъонаш хӀитто.
• Оха йукъадаха тарло upvotes / downvotes декъашхойн хетарийн мах хадоран некъаш, дагардар хӀитторан алгоритмаш, йа йукъараллин къамелан гӀирсаш, дӀаделлачу хаттарехь уггаре дика мах хадор къастош.
• Оха кхайкха тарло тобанашца а, говзалла лелорехь зеделларг долчу нахаца а цхьаьнаболхбар (масала, машенийн таллам).

Цхьа ойла йуй хьан? ХӀунда ца доькъу иза вайн IRC каналехь (#lib.reviews irc.freenode.net тӀехь) йа вайн дIасатасаран могӀамехула?

Муха гучудоху/дуьхьало йо мах луш долу дӀахьедарш?

There's no way to guarantee that a user hasn't been compensated in some way for a review they write on the Internet. For this reason, we don't absolutely forbid it, but please be aware that research shows even small incentives like product samples tend to bias review outcomes. We do not permit self-promotion, and we require that users disclose conflicts of interest clearly in their review. That means you'll have to point out any form of compensation you expect to receive or have received (including product samples). It is not acceptable for users to write reviews where the reviewer's opinion has been predetermined by a third party offering compensation, and we will block users for doing so.

In general, we want to build a community where users start to get to know each other, meet each other face-to-face, and self-organize to uncover quality issues. Technology as mentioned above is a part of this, but conversation and policy are equally important. We encourage you to join our community mailing list to help us think through these and other issues.

How do I create a version of lib.reviews in my language?

We use [https://translatewiki.net/> translatewiki.net as a platform for translation of the user interface. Translatewiki.net evolved alongside Wikipedia to support the translation of the user interface of Wikipedia and its sister projects into many languages, and is now used by other open source projects as well. It is itself fully open source.

You can see the progress of different language versions here. If you're new to translatewiki.net, after you sign up, it'll ask you to do 20 small example translations. This is a sort of extended "prove you know what you're doing" test; it takes about 10 minutes. Once your account is approved, visit this page and pick the language you're translating to in the top right corner.

Languages are enabled within a few days once they reach 100% completion. Updates are typically synchronized twice a week.

Pages like this one are also maintained and translated via TranslateWiki.net, see this page for more information.

Why is the code under CC-0 and not a conventional open source license?

CC-0 is the legally the safest route to put any piece of content (text, image, code, whatever) in the public domain in a manner that holds up to scrutiny under international law. Since we have no intention of enforcing legal claims against anyone for what they do with the lib.reviews codebase, a license that gives re-users maximum freedom with minimal friction seemed like a reasonable choice. Do keep in mind that the lib.reviews codebase depends on third party libraries licensed under various different open source licenses.

How does lib.reviews sustain itself? Is there a business plan?

For now, the people working on lib.reviews are all volunteers who work on the project without payment, in their spare time. If and when we reach the threshold where we feel the project is sufficiently mature and useful to justify asking for public support, we will likely start adding donation links and set up legal mechanisms for tax deductibility.

If you would like to support the project in a major way before then (realizing it will always be ad-free and non-profit), feel free to contact project founder Erik Moeller via eloquencegmail.com.

What is the relationship between lib.reviews and freeyourstuff.cc?

freeyourstuff.cc is a browser extension developed by Erik Moeller that lets you export reviews and other contributions you have made to proprietary websites like IMDB and Yelp. Optionally, you can also release these contributions under a free license on the freeyourstuff.cc website, allowing anyone to re-use them. In the long run, we want to make it easy to import contributions to lib.reviews with the help of the extension, but for now, there is no direct interface between the two projects yet.